Both run on Linux servers, come with issue trackers and offer a wide range of third-party integrations and import tools. And the highly active GitHub group of millions of developers who are involved and willing to talk about issues are primarily responsible for its success. GitLab, on the other hand, did some fantastic things like hosting community events and gatherings that bring open source contributors together.
Secure Your Digital Identity with These 5 Must-Have ITDR Features
Still, fundamentally, both offer web-based repositories with open-source, Git-based code management and local file changes with a remote repository. So, if all you want is basic Git functionality but with someone else to worry over keeping Git up and running, either service will do well for you. Organizations need software and product planning to be integrated with the rest of the development lifecycle versus treated like a siloed activity. This approach leverages people, process, and technology to go from idea to customer value with the fastest cycle time possible.
Bitbucket vs GitHub: Privacy and Access
Undoubtedly, GitHub is still the most popular git repository with the largest number of users and projects. However, GitLab is doing a fantastic job offering your entire development (and DevOps) teams great tools for more efficient workflows. GitHub is a repository hosting platform, offering https://traderoom.info/ everything a developer might need in terms of issue tracking and code management in one convenient free package. GitHub is so popular that it has become almost a synonym with Git. One reason is that GitLab, as noted above, offers a full-featured CI/CD suite in addition to code hosting.
A few alternatives to GitHub and GitLab
- When thinking about moving to GitLab or GitHub, you should also consider the setup costs and resources needed for getting started.
- GitLab is also a Git repository platform that allows developers to collaborate on code with an emphasis on DevOps workflow and continuous integration, with over 30 million users as of January 2023.
- GitLab’s internal projects allow you to facilitate the inner sourcing of your repositories.
- Meanwhile, public wikis are fully editable, even for users who don’t have a Bitbucket account.
Its simple interface shows your repositories in the form of tabs, such as Code, Projects, and Insights. The tab format makes the layout look a bit cluttered at first, but you’ll find https://traderoom.info/gitlab-vs-github/ it easy to navigate once you’re familiar with its horizontal navigation. It’s also possible to view different code versions side-by-side, allowing you to check the latest changes.
Software services
GitHub’s features are pretty similar to GitLab since they’re both essentially version control platforms for git. What separates the two is how users get access to the features available. Both GitLab and GitHub prioritize security, offering features like two-factor authentication and vulnerability detection. GitLab, however, provides additional security tools such as Static and Dynamic Application Security Testing, Dependency Scanning, and Container Scanning.
enterprises choose GitLab
GitLab and GitHub have disparate views on an ideal coding workflow, and we’ll cover these differences in our next section. You need to use an app or third-party integration with GitHub in many cases. You can get the same result—the feature—but you need to jump through some extra hoops to get there. We’ll cover this difference in more detail later, as we pinpoint where the services differ. Most companies turn to cloud-based solutions when working with larger remote or distributed teams.
The Premium plan is for software development teams needing enhanced coordination and team productivity. GitHub’s Free plan was built for individuals and software development teams with limited budgets needing basic features. It offers 2,000 CI/CD minutes per month, 500MB of Packages storage, unlimited public and private repositories, and community support. Bitbucket and GitHub are popular web-based hosting services for version control repositories. It also provides continuous integration, continuous delivery (CI/CD) support. At the initial stage, GitLab allowed the team members to collaborate and manage the source code, but later it was improved further.
The GitLab vs. GitHub debate has to settle for a tie in terms of project management features. This means your team of developers can easily collaborate and build apps from scratch using web-based resources. You and your team can also make stark comparisons of the apps you’ve developed and the changes made to them. GitLab, on the other hand, does not require third-party integrations at any point, making it easier to manage. It also pre-configures its pipeline integrations and allows parent and child pipelines to run simultaneously.
In terms of community support, GitHub is largely known for its huge open source community. Here, people are encouraged to join discussions, interact with other developers, or open issues. In addition to that, premium users get the IP whitelisting feature to help ensure that team members always access the projects from a safe IP address.
GitHub allows a team to share code and to improve the software build. Furthermore, the GitHub marketplace enables the developer to browse and buy the required apps. In GitLab’s workflow, you create multiple yet separate stable branches beyond that of the master branch for each set of changes you make. At a minimum, you’ll have production and pre-production stable branches. The multiple branch approach does require a multiple-step testing process.
You will then need to pay for additional 3rd party scanners for things like DAST, license compliance, container scanning, IaC scanning, ect. GitLab Ultimate (Enterprise as you stated) comes with 8+ scan types and many other governance features out of the box. Currently, GitHub doesn’t offer a self-hosted version of its platform (even on their enterprise plan), whereas GitLab does. You don’t even need an enterprise plan for it as they offer free plans for self-managed. An interesting difference between the two platforms is their stance towards integrations. GitLab took the stance of building a complete platform where (in theory) they offer everything you need without needing to reach for third-party tools and integrations (although they do support some).
For example, GitLab offers continuous integration, time tracking, and backups by default. With GitHub, however, you’d need an app for that functionality, such as the free CI app Jenkins. Developers from all over the world can easily collaborate on code.
Supports multiple project management methods like Kanban and Scrum. Both platforms offer good collaboration and project management features. They allow you to easily collaborate on change requests with code reviews and create issues to track tasks and requests for the project. They both allow you to create project boards that allow you to manage the overall direction of a project and how tasks are progressing using Scrum, Kanban, or other project management methods.
In terms of pricing, GitHub’s AI suite is slightly cheaper at $10 per user/month for individual use, while GitLab is priced at $19 per user/month. Here’s how the two stack up, along with their free, premium, and ultimate plans. It is quickly becoming the platform of choice for huge organizations like Sony and NASA.
Dunelm needed a platform that could build pipelines seamlessly, and had security built in from the onset. By using GitLab to improve security processes throughout the software development lifecycle, Dunelm accelerated deployments by 7 times. Boost efficiency and reduce cycle times with the help of AI throughout the entire software development lifecycle. Our AI-powered workflows, GitLab Duo, support teams at every stage from coding and testing to security, documentation, and governance. One of the key characteristics of GitLab is that it is written in the Ruby programming language. It offers an open-core development model and it’s an open source solution as well.